|
The safety of small vessels at sea is a problem that rarely
hits the headlines. Rather, it is the dramatic casualties of larger ships that
spark public interest and concern and safety initiatives developed by the
maritime industry tend to focus on large seagoing vessels such as tankers and
bulk carriers.
The development of safety criteria for big ships (eg bulk
carriers and tankers) is being progressed by IMO, which has recognised the need
to base this development on the safety level approach. This is a challenge for
the maritime industry as a whole and particularly for classification societies.
To meet the challenge, Polski Rejestr Statków (PRS) is building risk models
assessing the probability of ship sinkings due to structural failures. The risk
models assume various scenarios of progressing structural failure, as well as
mathematical models enabling the determination of structural failure probability
in the sequence of events of a given scenario. This approach may lead to more
rational safety criteria.
PRS believes that the oft-sidelined issues related to the
safety of smaller vessels also require action. Its new Research &
Development Division, established in 2006 and led by
Dr Stefan Grochowalski, is redressing the balance by progressing research into
the area of small vessel survivability in severe weather conditions.
Depending on individual ship type and size, different aspects
affect safety. In the case of large bulk carriers or tankers, the strength of
the ship structure is the decisive factor, while in the case of smaller vessels,
dynamic stability is the predominant factor.
Existing stability regulations governing small vessels are not sufficient.
This is reflected in accident statistics, which indicate that annual casualties
are several times more likely to involve smaller vessels than they are large
ships.
The main reasons for stability problems in smaller vessels and issues
affecting stability standardisation include:
- an unfavourable relation between stability capability and the magnitude of
external heeling moments (waves, wind);
- weight shifts that cause more significant changes in the centre of mass,
thus creating dramatic changes in stability;
- a large variety of types, designs, operational procedures, stability
features, etc, which make it difficult to develop a unified approach to
capsize prevention; and
- inadequate stability criteria and standards, which are based on static
stability in calm waters rather than a vessel’s real dynamic behaviour in
waves.
Particularly alarming is the safety of fishing vessels, which constitutes the
most acute and urgent problem. Small vessels, especially fishing vessels, often
lack technical documentation, are subjected to hull conversions and equipment
alterations without the appropriate supervision, demonstrate poor technical
condition due to a shortage of financial resources for technical improvements
and, in some cases, are manned by insufficiently skilled crews.
There is an urgent need for new rational criteria and standards
based on vessels’ real behaviour in extreme waves and not on static
considerations.
The overall objective of the PRS project is to increase the safety of vessel
operations in extreme weather conditions and significantly reduce the number of
accidents through the development of:
- new survivability standards and regulations based on vessel dynamics in
extreme weather conditions (breaking waves, freak waves, wind, etc) which will
provide safety against capsizing and foundering. These will form the basis for
improvement in ship design so that intact stability will be better assessed,
thus reducing the risk of capsizing;
- operational guidelines for individual types of ships to enhance and
supplement the their inherent stability;
- on-board decision support systems;
- instruction and training courses to educate crews about the basics of
stability safety and to demonstrate how they can avoid critical
mistakes.
The initiated development of criteria and standards preventing capsizing and
foundering in extreme waves involves:
- theoretical analyses of physical phenomena;
- development of mathematical models and computer software;
- model tests;
- systematic numerical simulations;
- statistical analyses of real accidents versus “safe” vessels;
- development of rational criteria preventing capsize; and
- development of safety standards and regulations.
Criteria and standards, once developed, require support in the form of
practical tools for the verification of ship geometry characteristics and the
examination of their actual safety levels. Such tools will significantly reduce
smaller vessels’ risk of capsizing and foundering in extreme weather conditions,
thus minimising the loss of human life and material goods in marine operations
and reducing marine environmental pollution.
One such tool is a program designed by PRS to measure small vessels’ dynamic
stability by simulating vessel movement with green water on deck. The theory and
algorithm developed on the basis of R&D studies initiated by PRS last year
have resulted in computer software that enables the simulation of small vessel
motion in irregular waves (and with water on deck) – right up to the point of
capsize.
PRS is confident that the criteria and standards being
developed, along with the tools for their implementation, should improve the
safety of newbuildings in the small vessel sector. However, the problem of the
large fleet already in existence is also waiting for a readily acceptable
solution.
The safety of existing small vessels needs to be evaluated. To
do that, methods enabling the reconstruction of the ships’ body lines and simple
methods for measuring the vessels’ centres of mass also need to be developed –
activities in which PRS is already engaged.
It must be remembered that the small vessel sector is governed
by certain peculiarities. For example, in the case of fishing vessels operations
are based largely on tradition rather than on vocational education. Such ships
are also very often family property and so owners can be either reluctant or
simply unable to put substantial investment into safety improvement. The sector
as a whole also forms a significant lobby group that strongly resists what it
often sees as unnecessary and costly methods for improving safety. Therefore,
the method for improving the safety of small vessels must be straightforward and
easy to implement. It will be a challenging task for maritime administrations,
classification societies and the small vessel sector itself, but a challenge
that urgently needs facing.
-ends-
For further information contact: Anna Stajewska, Polski Rejestr
Statków Tel: +48 58 341 17 64, Email: mailbox@prs.pl, Website: www.prs.pl
Issued by: Sharon Cunningham, Dunelm Public Relations
Tel: +44 20 7480 0600, Email: info@dunelmpr.co.uk, Website: www.dunelmpr.co.uk
|